About your Search

20130126
20130203
Search Results 0 to 13 of about 14 (some duplicates have been removed)
, a john and polly guth charitable fund. the clements foundation. park foundation, dedicated to heightening public awareness of critical issues. the herb alpert foundation, supporting organizations whose mission is to promote compassion and creativity in our society. the bernard and audre rapoport foundation. the john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation, committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. more information at macfound.org. anne gumowitz. the betsy and jesse fink foundation. the hkh foundation. barbara g. fleischman. and by our sole corporate sponsor, mutual of america, designing customized individual and group retirement products. that's why we're your retirement company. >> welcome. this week, two united states senators insisted that the justice department come clean. why are wall street's big banks not only too big to fail but too big to jail? senators sherrod brown of ohio, a democrat, and chuck grassley of iowa, a republican, are outraged that the giant banks violate the law with impunity -- laundering money, cheating homeowners, falsifying information -
to interview that future ceo. his name was john mack. it was denied. and it was because there was communication between morgan stanley's lawyer, who at the time was mary jo white, and the higher ups at the sec who included the director of enforcement, linda thomsen. aguirre was later fired for complaining about having this investigation squelched. >> blowing the whistle. >> for blowing the whistle. but the sec was later forced to pay a $750,000 wrongful termination suit to aguirre in that case. but what's so interesting is that aguirre's boss, the guy who killed that case, went to work for mary jo white's firm nine months after the case died. and he got, you know, a multi-million dollar position. it's a classic example of how the revolving door works in washington. you know, you have these regulators at the sec. and they know that there's that job out there waiting for them. so how hard are they really going to regulate these companies when they know they can get that money? but in washington, you know, people kind of shake their heads at it because it's so common you know, that these people, t
. the kohlberg foundation. independent production fund, with support from the partridge foundation, a john and polly guth charitable fund. the clements foundation. park foundation, dedicated to heightening public awareness of critical issues. the herb alpert foundation, supporting organizations whose mission is to promote compassion and creativity in our society. the bernard and audre rapoport foundation. the john d. and catherine t. macartr foundation, coitted to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. more information at macfound.org. anne gumowitz. the betsy and jesse fink foundation. the hkh foundation. barbara g. fleischman. and by our sole corporate sponsor, mutual of america, designing customized individual and group retirement products. that's why we're your retirement company. >>> welcome. like just about everyone else, i enjoy a good show, and the inauguration of a president is one of those spectacles of democracy that can make us remember we're part of something big and enduring. so for a few hours this past monday, the pomp and circumstance inspired us to think gover
. the bernard and audre rapoport foundation. the john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation, committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. more information at macfound.org. anne gumowitz. the betsy and jesse fink foundation. the hkh foundation. barbara g. fleischman. and by our sole corporate sponsor, mutual of america, designing customized individual and group retirement products. that's why we're your retirement company. >>> welcome. like just about everyone else, i enjoy a good show, and the inauguration of a president is one of those spectacles of democracy that can make us remember we're part of something big and enduring. so for a few hours this past monday, the pomp and circumstance inspired us to think government of, by, and for the people really is just that, despite the predatory threats that stalk it. unfortunately, the mood didn't last. so help me, every now and then, as the cameras panned upward to that great dome towering above the ceremony, i was reminded of something the good feeling of the moment could not erase. it's the journalists' curse to have a
that wanted to challenge the texas law that criminalized abortion, and they appeared as john and mary doe. and they said, look, mary doe has a health condition that if she becomes pregnant and it continues forward, she might die. and this is very bad for her. there's no 100% safe contraceptive. so if we don't have the possibility of legal abortion, it not only risks her health, but it interferes in, i think they called it, "their marital happiness." and interestingly enough, the supreme court threw them out of the case. they said, you don't have standing. your interest in marital happiness is too distant from what we're talking about here. and which, i think means that in 1973 the supreme court hadn't accepted heterosexuality. but what they really did, too, which i think is a shame, is they really had -- i wonder if they had kept that couple in, whether men's role in pregnancy and the outcomes of intercourse would've played a much healthier and more honest role. every pregnancy has had a man involved. we live in a country where women are blamed for everything, for having abortions, for ha
Search Results 0 to 13 of about 14 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)